And I did. I wonder if you actually read the links you litter my comments with.

Note. the first link is to a community outreach program designed "to increase the diversity of the law school applicant pool." This does not address any of the issues I point out in the section you highlighted.

The second is the students making exactly the same point I'm making in the article. That Georgetown isn't doing enough to support the minority students at the university. Note, this is the students speaking, not the faculty. I do think the students understand their own needs.

But thanks to your legendary lack of reading comprehension, you haven't realised that the article you linked focuses almost exclusively on anti-semitism at the school.

And where it does mention Sellers, the student interviewed misrepresents her comments (Sellers at no point suggests that black students aren't capable of performing well), and the college, again, does none of the things I suggest. Instead, it added "additional voluntary nondiscrimination training for faculty, plans to spread awareness of the school’s bias reporting system," all of which is meaningless with regards to helping black students perform better unless you think that this woman who feels bad that some of her black students are performing badly is simultaneously making them perform badly.

And adds funding to an existing program that is only available to first years, is not even available to all the first years who apply, and obviously isn't doing its job, otherwise Sellers' students wouldn't have been struggling often enough to cause the comments in the first place.

Again, you repeatedly come off looking foolish in these conversations because you're in such a rush to "win" whatever the hell that even means to you, that you don't take the time to figure out what you're talking about.

You don't care about the students affected by these issues. Because if you did, you'd at least have taken the time to read the articles. This is just some weird game to you.