Haha, you're description of my reply as irrational after your bizarre rant about homo sapiens is intriguing. But the line you're trying to draw here is even more so.

Would you describe Hitler's hatred of the Jews as a "feud"? How about the genocide of the Tutsi? Just a feud? The Bosnian genocide maybe?

You think it's okay to engage in moral relativism about these things because the thing their murderers didn't like was their religion or their culture and not the colour of their skin?

Speaking as if this is Victorian England doesn't lend any weight to your argument I'm afraid. Nor do laughable accusations about a lack of moral sophistication.

You want to believe that your particular brand of victimhood is sacrosanct. You're wrong.