Hahahahaha, you sir, are an idiot. You're so lost in abstractions that it seems you can't tell the difference between ontological arguments and the real world. The U.S. doesn't want to field your questions because they're asinine! This case you hope to win (ha!) in the SCOTUS sounds like the most moronic, quixotic thing I've ever heard.

Let me say it again. Nobody is thinking about the "official definition of race" when deciding to racially profile somebody or assume they're a criminal because their skin is a few shades too dark or attack them because they hate n*****s. You're trying to solve the least important aspect of an issue which utterly transcends "official definitions". Are you really so lost that you can't see this?

Look, I said I wasn't interested in debating you and I meant it. You have said absolutely nothing of value and are frankly wasting my time. So I’ll make you a deal. Go find some Neo-Nazis, or some members of the Aryan brotherhood, and explain to them that this whole "race" thing has all been a huge misunderstanding. Have them read your fascinating little articles so that they understand race isn’t real in terms they simply can't repudidate. Present your very best arguments that they shouldn’t identify as white because the category is a myth and racial purity is a nonsensical fallacy. Please, PLEASE, capture it on video.

If a single one of them says, “Huh…you’re right! I've never thought about it that way! It’s peace and love for me from here on out!”, I will sing from the highest, most public treetop that you were right and I was wrong. Until then, this is just mental masturbation. Which, as the name implies, you can do by yourself.