Hey Johnny, we've spoken in the comments before, so I'm disappointed to see you thought it wasn't worth engaging. But seeing as you've tagged me here, it seems you want a response. So here it is; no, this isn't my logic at all. BLM is not a "black supremacist" organisation.

A better analogy would be; if a bunch of black people turn up at an alleged white supremacist rally, is it really a white supremacist rally? Or, to stay right on topic, if five black people beat a black man to death, is the cause really white supremacy?

I totally concede that it might be. As I pointed out in response to your comment on my article, it's pretty much always possible that something is true. But my logic is that for every black person that joins this alleged "white supremacist" rally, especially if they're allowed to join, the likelihood that it's accurately characterised as white supremacy diminishes.

Especially when you add the context that police officers frequently beat white people to death too. Is a white cop kneeling on the back of white civilian until he suffocates, as happened to Tony Timpa, about white supremacy? I mean, again, I guess it could be, but you're really going to have to do some legwork to explain that one.

I’m not saying that there isn’t a racism problem within the police force. There very obviously is. But the evidence suggests that Timpa's case, as well as Nicholls', is better explained by a culture of violence and a lack of accountability that also sees police officers, for example, be significantly more likely to commit domestic violence. Or maybe that correlation is white supremacy too?

I don't know if you'll think this is me "bullshitting" or whether "bullshitting" is just code for an argument that exposes complexities you'd rather not think about. But that's my non-dumbass take.

p.s. Yes, I know what subconscious priming is.