I guess I'm just not sure why you think you know this. You have absolutely nothing to go by except the IDFs word.

Israel have dropped around 65,000 tons of unguided bombs on targets known to have civilians. That's three times the explosive force of the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima. They've destroyed apartment buildings, refugee camps, schools, a third of Gaza's homes have been destroyed (in fact, it's probably higher than that by now, this was a month ago). 1.8 million Gazans have been displaced. Do you really believe all of these targets had "military value"?

Israeli snipers killed two women outside a church, IDF soldiers killed three shirtless Israeli hostages who were speaking in Hebrew and waving a white flag. I could go on and on.

So I'm extremely curious why you think the word "indiscriminate" is unfairly applied? What more do they need to do before you'd apply this word?

And yes, of course, you're right; in a war, you don't arrest the enemy. But the Palestinian civilians aren't the enemy. We've been told by the Israeli government, over and over again, that their war is with Hamas, not the Palestinian people. Yet in 100 days, ~25,000 Palestinians have been killed. 250 every day. !00 children every day. And this in retaliation for 1,200 civilians killed. We're way past discussions of proportionality.

And the thing that I can't believe doesn't give more people pause, is the they're not stopping! This isn't a case where we're close to the end game. Where it's clear how all of this will achieve Israel's aims and secure its safety. Where there's a path forward for the Palestinian population in Gaza.

It's still absolutely unclear how any of this achieves Israel's military goals or even what Israel's military goals are. How will they know when they've "eradicated Hamas"? How many civilians are they willing to kill to achieve that? How do they plan to prevent future attacks by a population that now has 25,000 (and counting) reasons to hate them?