No, but it does seem to suggest that you think if America's population is kept at replacement levels it will be somehow immune from the effects of carbon emissions or the housing crisis.

Setting aside the question of whether fertility rate alown leads to population growth (it doesn't), if carbon emissions are your concern, why are you voting for a man who has repeatedly shown complete disdain for the environment? From pulling out of the Paris climate accord to putting Scott Pruit in charge of the EPA, Trump has shown very clearly that carbon emsissions are not a concern of his