No. I didn't do this. And if you want to know my perspective, READ THE ARTICLES!! I go to a great deal of time and energy to express my perspective in them. I'm happy to go into further detail with readers, but not when the stupid questions they ask make it clear they haven't even taken the time to understand what I'm writing about.

The first article was about the achievements of a male in female sport. Not about female achievement. Note, I don't even mention Caster Semenya in the article. The second article was about a male who abuses the race and sex of his nominees for his own political gain. Not about female achievement. I'm delighted that Jackson has been appointed to the court and annoyed that there is any grounds to question the validity of her nomination.

So no, I'm not saying strangers have a right to question your sex and race when you start winning awards or gaining power. You're desperately trying to twist my words to mean something they obviously don't mean. It's just so stupid.