Nope.

Article 2 of the Genocide Convention defines genocide as any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

A lot of people's objection to the word "genocide" is simply that it sounds too serious. That it can only be applied in situations where something absolutely apocalyptic is happening. Well, first of all, what's happening in Gaza is apocalyptic. And second of all, Israel is arguably guilty of genocide by at least three of these five standards.

And if you include the stated intent of members of Netanyahu's government, including Netanyahu himself, the case becomes pretty much impossible to argue.