Okay man, this is silly. You're too triggered to even be able to have a conversation.
I'm not judging you at all. I said, what, three separate times that there's no moral judgement involved in anything I'm saying. I don't consider myself morally superior, I've never played the victim, you're just not very bright and you're determined to see me as some kind of ogre because you're still butthurt about a conversation we had over a year ago.
You're a human being, like me. Sure, we clearly have our differences, but the simple fact of your humanity is all I need to know to know countless things about you. And you, about me. For example, both of us want to live with our loved ones with dignity and freedom. Both of us will object, to varying degrees, if we feel we've been treated unfairly. Both of us will seek justice if we feel wronged or if our loved ones are hurt. Both of us are capable of terrible things if we're scared enough or angry enough or feel hopeless enough.
Anybody who denies these things is not being honest. And you can tell they're not being honest because their words won't match their actions if they ever find themselves in these situations.
This simple knowledge of human nature, which everybody has, is enough to understand the situation in Israel/Palestine pretty well. Everything else is just context and an understanding of the history of the conflict.
No, I didn't read your article, I get more than enough of your "thoughts" reading your comments. Nothing in them persuades me that there are any insights to be found in your writings.
Anyway, I'm also not persuaded there's anything to be gained by continuing here, so I'm done wasting my time. As one other commenter eloquently put it, I was pretty much finished with this conversation when it started.
Although, of course, you lack the self-awareness to ask yourself why you receive feedback like this from people or why they don’t read your articles. You must be right, so it’s everybody else who’s wrong, right?