The article is about sexual abse. Specifically child sexual abuse. So yes, I'm focused, for the purposes of this discussion, on child sexual abuse. Yes, adults can also be abused. I never claimed otherwise. Obviously. But the nature of that abuse is different because children are more vulnerable and easily manipulated than adults.

Your arguments keep getting more and more ridiculous because the only way you can justify your position is to pretend you don't understand basic concepts like maturity and consent.

So yes, I agree. We can't discuss this. You want to frame a desire to protect children as sexual repression. It's not. You want to paint me as hysterical. I'm not. I just care about something that, for some reason, you want to minimise. The question (and this is purely rhetorical, I won't be reading any more of your responses) is why you don't care.

p.s. I’ll add to this, seeing as you’re so hilariouly triggered by the suggestion that you be considerate of others regarding nudity, that I made it very clear that my problem wasn’t with nudity, mine or anybody else's, but with a lack of consideration for others.

I went and re-read the conversation just to see, and all it shows is that you’re the kind of person who is unwilling to consider other people’s boundaries.

Anyway, this latest conversation at least explains the mystery of why you previously stopped responding when I asked you if you’d show more consideration about nudity around children.