Ugh, once again, I'm not saying that you can't talk about a subject, that's how people learn. I'm saying that you can't position yourself as an expert when you're not. For example, if you’ve only skim-read the bible, you shouldn’t position yourself as a theologian. Similarly, you shouldn't be defending CRT when all you know about it is coming from people who agree with it.

You shouldn't be comparing the harm that CRT might do with the harm "whites" have done, when CRT is simply a new form of racism which is gaining a lot of social support.

CRT harms people too. My article even explains how, yet you're arguing with me about it because it "could be detrimental to Black children" but appartently not as harmful as "whites". What are you talking about here? How do you know this? Why is someting which is detrimental to black children acceptable to you? What "harm" in the present day, are you comparing it to?

I took the time to find you links and give you recommendations because I think this is important. If you don't, fine. I suspect you're not going to be teaching CRT to children in schools. But if you're not interested in learning about it, I'm not sure why we're having this discussion. I'm also not sure why you're defending it.

Also, you keep saying that talking isn't the solution. Fine. What's your plan? If you have a better idea then I'm all ears. If you just want to sound like a tough guy by pretending that you're going to start a revolution when you definitely won't, then you're wasting my time.