Who is the impartial observer here? You? Because your inaccuracies demonstrate pretty clearly that you're not impartial. Yes, I know I was correct about the person spreading his legs. I wrote the article. The salient point here is that you were not correct despite suggesting that you read the article carefully.

And I brought up the LGBT community because many of the disturbing things happening with kids are being justified as "acceptance" of LGBT people. Addressing the issue while leaving the lGBT community out of it is therefore not an option. Many of the teachers doing this insane stuff are specifically justifying it by using their LGBT identities.

You think other people aren't making this connection and blaming LGBT people? One of whom even popped up in my comments before I corrected him? You think accounts like "LibsofTikTok" are nuancing this point for their millions of followers?

I chose not to include videos of children dancing on stripper poles or parading half naked at pride parades. I chose not to mention the people calling for pedophiles to be welcomed under the LGBT umbrella. You'd be astonished at how much stuff I know that I don't say. Precisely because, again, a central theme of the article is that the LGBT community shouldn't be used as justification or a scapegoat for this stuff.

I don't mind talking about racism at all. And I talk about it with white people all the time. Again, as you've read my work before, you're well aware of this. What I mind is you telling me that LGBT issues and race issues are exactly the same. and then doubling down when I point out they're not, without even asking why I say that. Note, black people never use LGBT issues to add emotional leverage to their points. Yet it happens in reverse almost daily.

Anyway, this conversation is going nowhere. It's bizarre being accused of defensiveness simply because I'm pointing out literal inaccuracies in your comments, when you're calling me "clueless" and "offensive" and "outraged." When you're insinuating that I'm transphobic and telling me to "tone it down," when I'm not being aggressive and "not to dare" say things I'm not saying. What have I said that compares to any of this? Do you really not see how in your feelings you are? Do you really think you're being objective?

I'm happy to reset if you want to have a reasonable conversation. If your next reply is in the same vein I won't respond.