Yeah, I remember you. I quite enjoyed not having to explain my articles to you after the fact because you were unable to understand them the first time.

But just as you felt entitled to explain racism and privilege to me, I feel entitled to talk about an issue that, actually, I understand very well indeed.

And if you were able to read without going straight into your feelings, you'd notice that this article is an attempt to decrease the toxicity of this debate. The same aim I've had in each of my articles (far less than 20) on this topic.

It's so boring to just keep having the same childish argument. People like you demand that everything related to gender ideology, no matter how obviously problematic, be completely above criticism. Anything that isn't 100% affirming, anything that doesn't claim that the entire commuity is 100% perfect victims, anything that doesn't lie about the glaring flaws with gender ideology, is "punching down" on trans people.

If that's how you feel, then fine. I'm not even slightly interested in proving myself to you.

I'll just say that it's very telling that you think I'm the one pinning trans people down to either poor misgendered souls or dangerous predators. It's telling that you've just "read" an article explaining very clearly that transgender people are not predators but the category trans has become meaninglessly broad, a fact that hurts trans people most of all, and accuse me of conflating trans women and predators.

I'm doing literally the opposite of any of this. But you're not actually reading. Which as I remmebr is par for the course for you. So I won't waste any more time arguing with your caricature of what I'm saying.