Yes, before repeatedly attacking me, misrepresenting my work, and accusing me of bigotry. I'm not doing calculus over here. Saying that you like my writing doesn't give you two free character attacks or three free mischaracterisations.

I haven't attacked or belittled you. I pointed out what seems to be fairly obvious, which is that you haven't read what I've written carefully and are reacting to misinterpretations.

And again, I have in no way, at any point, tried to claim that any of the people described in the article represent the LGBT community. Almost the entire thesis of the article (other than the importance of protecting children), is that the LGBT community should not be used as cover for this behaviour, and that it doesn't represent them. And as I've already pointed out, most of the examples I cite have absolutely nothing to do with the LGBT community.

I'll leave at this. Take a browse through the other comments here. Not a single other person has perceived the article in the same way you have. So either they're all biased or you're not being as impartial as you think you are. Either way, I have no desire to argue with you.